Yorat
oh jester, oh fool
behold! such enduring cranial structure
mandible jarringly articulate
temporally fused
with dirt
that foul mouth shuttered
shit! shit! shit!
impression unshattered
of teeth
reminiscent of smile
all in your head
a kettlebell training log, and
a launch pad for aberrant missives
Yorat
oh jester, oh fool
behold! such enduring cranial structure
mandible jarringly articulate
temporally fused
with dirt
that foul mouth shuttered
shit! shit! shit!
impression unshattered
of teeth
reminiscent of smile
all in your head

If you look closely, you will see that this bird is bleeding. I was walking up Fillmore on my way to my favorite scoop shop, Three Twins Ice-Cream, when I saw a collared cat bounding down the street, bird in the grip of its teeth, obviously having a field day. The cat reminds me of one sweet cat that I used to play with, but this one is trim, more athletic, a ready plunderer. No wonder, considering it is being let out like a dog and allowed to hunt like a cat, with the proud owner in tow, who obviously was also having a field day. The owner-dude chased the cat around the corner. Trophy discarded. The freed prey hobbled over to the wall for its photo op, contracting into its own huddle.
Now don't get me wrong. I do not like pigeons. Especially when they shit in front of my building, fueled by the bread crumbs that the building manager's wife likes to throw at them. (I will never be caught dead feeding pigeons in the park, not now, not when I'm 90 and old and decrepit and crumbly.) I also have no problem with how the food chain works.* We shouldn't circumscribe the free expression of basic animal instincts, mine or yours or our companion friends'. But we, as human beings, can do better. If we're in the business of domesticating canines and felines and feigning civilized behavior, then the following applies: dog owners should pick up, scrape up, scoop up whatever consistency presents; and cat owners - if your toy-pet or pet-toy has halfway bitten through a bird, it is your responsibility to put the victim out of its misery. It is the decent thing to do. I would extend the same courtesy if I'd accidentally - or not so accidentally - run over your cat.
*A tenuous tie-in to the health care debate (+ Darwin + Buddha), but I will attempt ... Compassion FTW, yes. Universal health care? Largely anti-evolutionary, if you ask me. We are getting very good at managing and eliminating physical pain, but until we confront and dissolve the root cause of suffering - attachment - we will stay on the same karmic wheel as the pigeon and the cat and the cat owner and the people of Congress. Just so our little bird does not die in vain, I will make three points to send it off to its next incarnation: 1. An enlightened mind does not get attached to tax dollars, because the IRS will collect anyway; or to life, which will end anyway. 2. Compassion is a trait of evolved human consciousness; it does not engender a "right" to health care, or to anything else, for that matter. 3. I am totally okay with the idea that I may end up as roadkill someday; nobody owes me any expensive extraordinary measures to keep me alive. Just clean up the mess afterwards and don't ruin another person's ice-cream appetite. That's all. C'est la vie.
FACEBOOK DEFAULTS TO ANNOYANCE
And each iteration more so. Obviously Facebook's strategy is to grow its user-base by relentlessly streaming who's-friends-with-whom info on the News Feed. It is Facebook's assumption that the typical user is so relentlessly mercenary that has been such a huge turn-off for me. It is insulting. I have no issue at all with networking and respectfully making use of connections. It is entirely within Facebook's capacity to make it a powerful social networking engine without denigrating the meaning of friendship. Restoring status updates as the default stream would be a great start. I find it absolutely refreshing that I can hide the Buzz following-follower info from my public Google Profile. It is not about privacy at all; rather, for once, we can regard ourselves not as part of a numbers game, but as individuals who perhaps have something to share during the day that is of interest or import to other connected beings.
FACEBOOK IS A DISTRACTION FROM SOCIAL CHANGE
I put it this way because we all need distraction sometimes from life itself. But if you really care about productivity and not wasting your time in front of the computer on pseudo-social causes or sedentary leisure, consider this:
As of 11:50 PM, Thursday, February 11, 2010, the number of fans belonging to the following Facebook groups:
That there are so many haters of Facebook apps says less about the users of those apps than Facebook's presumptuous notion that their usage is anything remotely newsworthy. In all likelihood Facebook does not even presume that; after all, it's run by very smart people. It is blatantly forcing that information upon your News Feed to entice you to click on the brown baby calf. There must be a certain demographic group or personality trait that is associated with susceptibility to the mooing of the brown baby calf - congratulations, Facebook, for that is your golden calf.
I support same-sex marriage, but I don't BET on anything to make a statement. Unfortunately, many Facebook "Pages" and "Groups" only amount to virtual pheromones that give the impression that you're of a certain ilk, that may be of significance as a filter or deal-breaker if you're actually going to mate with someone, but are otherwise inconsequential as a force or even indicator of social change. To the person who started "1,000,000 Strong Against Sarah Palin" but only hit 21 percent membership target - you're a loser picking on another loser. GET A LIFE!
PSA: If you really believe in marriage equality, follow the Prop 8 trial here and support Courage Campaign with your money and activism.
The red and blue / "gold" comparison proves, definitively, that better Facebooking results do not translate to superiority in anything else.
FACEBOOK ADS ARE DUMB
I have never minded the "Sponsored Links" that I see on Gmail's web portal. And if Buzz must come with Google Ads, so be it - it would be a thousand times better than the dumb-ass targeted ads that Facebook advertisers generate with my birth date, gender, and other personal info. Again, it's not a privacy issue for me; this is just bot-made nonsense. But I find utterly yucky and icky and distasteful and insulting the language and tone of those ads. "Are you an 18-year-old idiot? If you are, we have free crap reserved for you if you qualify. Hurry up! Offer expires at midnight." Really? REALLY??? Just because an ad picked up on my age doesn't make it a smart ad. People who click on those ads are fucking losers.
I have been a disaffected Facebook user for a long while, so I welcome Google Buzz heartily as an alternative, and so far I have nothing bad to say about it. The bugs will be fixed, and I am awaiting the mobile app for my phone. If, as I suspect, Facebook's monetization strategy is to capitalize on losers doing what losers do, then my opinion is entirely irrelevant to the stakeholders, which is fine by me, because Buzz will pick it up regardless.